14 Comments
User's avatar
Dan Pommier's avatar

Just more talk and fluff, the same shit over and over again. This country is doomed unfortunately.

Expand full comment
JK's avatar

We’re all familiar with the expression ‘tipping point’. I’m afraid we’re well beyond that. Thanks Sam, for keeping us up to date

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

This law is more about online surveillance of Canadians. Should the Govt stumble on a criminal network during this surveillance then maybe they do something about it but I highly doubt it. What a joke. I hate to say it but Canada isn’t a country free to itself anymore. It really isn’t and that saddens me as your neighbor to the south. This is what happens when you keep electing liberal politicians who align with the European globalists. Things are changing but I feel it’s too late for Canada. You’ve gone past the rubicon.

Expand full comment
Dan Pommier's avatar

Yes James, you are correct.

Expand full comment
Michael Baird esq's avatar

As long as the vote is private it can not be monitored by we people. One has to take personal responsibility for their vote and it must be displayed on a public ledger. Did you vote for mysterious mark?

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

I remember when paper ballots were used in every state and we knew who the president was by around midnite. Now we have these electronic ones and it takes days. Last election 20 million votes disappeared compared to 2020. Idk about elections but I feel it was monitored closer in 2024 than 2020.

Expand full comment
Jim M's avatar

I'm glad you pointed out the 2 SCC cases which tie the hands of our law enforcement and make them reluctant to share information with their American counterparts.

What I don't understand is the gov't ignoring input from our police that our laws need to be changed. Your excellent reporting has made many people aware of the depth of the problem with cartels and drugs. So the gov't HAS to also know. Which leads us to conclude that there are payoffs to NOT updating our laws.

Trudeau meeting with a known drug kingpin in a closed door event shows that they barely try to hide the corruption. Carney isn't going to fix this or any other issue.

Expand full comment
John Walker's avatar

Hey folks it’s even worse!

It has been reported by both Judge Cullen and his b.s. Money Laundering “Inquiry”,… retired RCMP Supt German and Diane Francis, an investigative reporter, that certain lawyers in B.C. are in the lucrative business of money laundering. these scum bags are using their trust accounts to “cleanse” the dirty money. Hey. Cullen didn’t even recommend shutting them to hell down. Now WHY in hell would that be?

Has it anything to do with the fact that the “dirty interest” on the “dirty money”, while in those trust accounts, goes to…..now get this……. the Law Society of B.C. ..which is then invested by the Law Foundation of B.C. Now guess WHO benefits from those investments? And guess WHO,…. according to the “original” Legal Profession Act, published decades ago, and in safe keeping,…….is a “life bencher” of the LawSociety of B.C. Yaaahh…. you got it folks!

The RCMP made a bid to investigate lawyers trust accounts … and guess what folks. The umbrella group for Law Societies. …. “across Canada” ,,,,,,took the case to the Supreme Court of Canada to oppose such scrutiny by the cops!

Another guess what folks? The court considered it a breach of client solicitor priveleges…. and thereby preventing the police from investigating those trust accounts. And now folks…. another guess what? Who do you suppose those judges are on the bench of the Supreme Court of Canada? I don’t know what the legal professions acts that govern “other”provinces, but I sure as hell know what the “original” Legal Professions Act in B.C.states regarding “judges”/life benchers states. The “original” Legal Professions Act of B.C. is in safe keeping for further referencing BECAUSE the NDP has made massive changes to the Act this year. To “remove” incriminating evidence? I don’t know, as the system seems so corrupt it doesn’t seem possible to keep up with the ROT.

Expand full comment
G M's avatar

Why is the government afraid of effective laws and enforcement that will prevent these types of illegal activities?

Expand full comment
Michael Baird esq's avatar

Fear is assuaged by gifting. Do not bite the hand that feeds you

Expand full comment
Doug Stephens's avatar

The Elbows Up Regime continues to take Canada deeper into a totalitarian government.

The gun grab, C-2, the online harms act C-? (was C-63 under the previous regime), and the upcoming push for digital ID, and CBDC's.

And of course C-5 which gives the Regime the decision making power of what can and can't be built in this once great Country.

Expand full comment
patrick seymour's avatar

as usual the liberals are flapping they,re gums for photo opps and achieving nothing...it,s bait and switch all over again...pretend they are doing something over here while when they think you,re not looking they are making more loop holes to allow for Carney,s conflict of interest bullshit...holy crap what a mess....!!!oh well!!! i guess it,s what we voted for....orange man bad !!!...now i can,t afford a beer!!! cheers!

Expand full comment
Vicki's avatar

Good morning, Sam. Does this decision add a potential new layer of problems?

B.C. judge seals affidavit because subject is Indigenous

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLZj-nuSU6A

Expand full comment