REPOST: CSIS report says China infiltrated Provincial and Federal Party leadership races in 2022
Canadian Mayoral candidate got clandestine financial support from community leaders mobilized by Chinese Consulate in 2022 and 2018: "Intelligence Assessment"
Editor’s Note:
We are reposting this exclusive story because its explosive findings—drawn from a leaked October 2022 CSIS Intelligence Assessment and The Bureau’s 2023 investigative analysis—offer an unmatched window into foreign interference in Canadian democracy at a critical moment. Newly appointed Prime Minister Mark Carney is reportedly set to call a federal election within days, amid escalating geopolitical stakes.
Tensions with Washington remain severe under President Trump’s aggressive stance. In an interview on March 18, 2025, Trump stated, “I think it’s easier to deal actually with a Liberal, and maybe they’re going to win, but I don’t really care,” implying a preference for Carney. He also criticized Pierre Poilievre, saying, “the Conservative that’s running is, stupidly, no friend of mine.” Some observers argue that these increasingly forceful statements—amid Trump’s threats to impose or expand tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico—may destabilize Canadian society and constitute a form of U.S. interference.
Nevertheless, Canada remains a member of the Five Eyes alliance and other Western security partnerships, even as the risk of broader conflict involving Russia and China intensifies.
Meanwhile, Canadian intelligence continues to classify China as the greatest threat by far to the nation’s sovereignty, citing expanding infiltration efforts across the political spectrum. As The Bureau reported yesterday, this interference—facilitated by Chinese Consulate officials working directly with diaspora community proxies—extends from local to federal levels.
A core revelation in this re-posted story is that a senior Canadian provincial politician allegedly covertly met with Chinese Consulate officials in 2022 and ultimately became Beijing’s favored candidate. The Bureau’s analysis indicates these Chinese United Front networks, particularly active in British Columbia, have reached into federal, provincial, and municipal politics. In Vancouver specifically, key operatives appear to support various figures across all three major parties—NDP, Conservative, and Liberal—including at least one unsuccessful contender in the 2022 Conservative leadership race.
Looking ahead to the impending federal election, there is evidence suggesting Pierre Poilievre was disfavored during the Conservatives’ 2022 leadership contest, owing to Beijing’s perception of him as hostile to Chinese interests. Meanwhile, Chinese media outlets have signaled Mark Carney was favored by Beijing’s networks in that recently concluded race, while Chrystia Freeland—Carney’s main opponent—was attacked on WeChat, a crucial vector of Chinese interference, according to The Bureau’s reporting yesterday.
The CSIS findings detailed in this report raise allegations of clandestine funding, covert meetings, and strategic influence operations stretching from municipal elections to federal leadership contests. The Bureau’s investigation shows how alleged Beijing proxies purchased party memberships to boost their preferred leadership candidates—often those deemed less “anti-China.” These activities align with earlier disinformation attacks on former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole in 2021, pointing to attempts to reshape Canada’s political landscape well before the coming federal contest.
With Carney’s rise occurring in a potentially compromised environment, urgent questions remain: Did Beijing’s tactics affect Carney’s leadership victory? Will these same networks shape the imminent election? And how will Trump’s vocal—and possibly intrusive—stance, alongside potential tariffs, further complicate Canada’s already fraught political climate?
VANCOUVER, Canada — A senior Canadian politician running to lead a provincial political party clandestinely met officials inside a Chinese Consulate in 2022, subsequently becoming China’s preferred candidate, and winning campaign support from Consulate proxies, a classified CSIS document alleges.
Details of the Consulate meeting are contained in a sweeping CSIS “Intelligence Assessment” dated October 31, 2022.
Without identifying candidates by name, it details Beijing’s efforts to influence leaders of Canadian parties – at the federal, provincial and municipal level – before and after recent elections.
The report’s chief allegation – Chinese officials arranged in June 2022 to surreptitiously meet an elected provincial official only identified as “CA3” — suggests CSIS monitored a particular candidate in Alberta or British Columbia.
This is because the B.C. NDP and Alberta United Conservatives were the only provincial parties reportedly selecting leaders in the June to October 2022 timeframe described by the Intelligence Assessment. Canada hosts four Chinese Consulates, in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Montreal.
Responding to questions fromThe Bureau, the B.C. NDP and Alberta Conservatives both denied any awareness of the Chinese Consulate meeting alleged in the CSIS document.
But ramifications of the CSIS Intelligence Assessment are much broader than China’s interference in a single provincial leadership campaign.
The document strongly suggests that People’s Republic proxies financially infiltrated the federal Conservative’s 2022 leadership contest, shortly after leader Erin O’Toole was attacked with Chinese disinformation, during the fall 2021 federal election.
The Intelligence Assessment says proxies attempted to elect a federal party’s new leader, purchasing party memberships to support an unidentified candidate, with the objective of tempering the federal party’s perceived “anti-China” stance.
This document also refers to a “CA1” — believed to mean Candidate 1 — and points to a “meeting and the Consulate’s endorsement.”
“CA1 said they were unconcerned, as CA1 knows ‘how the underground works’ and that ‘they’ (the PRC Consulate) had supported CA1 in various past elections,” the CSIS document reviewed by The Bureau says.
It doesn’t explain who Candidate 1 is.
The October 2022 CSIS document also says hostile states secretly fund preferred candidates via community networks in Canada.
It cites successive elections in a particular Canadian city, where a Chinese Consulate mobilized three “co-opted” community groups to clandestinely channel funds and “material support” to an unidentified mayoral candidate in 2018 and 2022.
British Columbia has already been identified as a hotbed of Chinese election interference, because CSIS intelligence verified from multiple sources asserts that former Vancouver-area Conservative MP Kenny Chiu was attacked with Chinese disinformation in the 2021 election, because he proposed a foreign agent registry.
The October 2022 Intelligence Assessment alleging clandestine financial support of a mayoral candidate may also point to the Chinese Consulate in Vancouver and Mayor Ken Sim. This is because case details appear to align with allegations in another Top Secret CSIS report reviewed by The Bureau.
This previous, January 2022 document, says China’s Consul General in Vancouver “stated that they needed” to rally Chinese diaspora voters in Vancouver’s 2022 mayoral election “to come out and elect a specific Chinese-Canadian candidate,” because “the candidate will rely on those votes.”
The Globe and Mail previously reported some of the details from this January 2022 document, which names Vancouver’s Consul General, Tong Xiaoling.
What The Globe didn’t report, is the CSIS record’s summary conclusion, which says: “This report demonstrates CG Tong’s continued interest in involving herself in Canadian electoral processes to benefit the PRC.”
There is no suggestion in the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment the unidentified mayoral candidate or the provincially elected official “CA3” wittingly accepted support from China.
Furthermore the document contains intelligence, which doesn’t carry the same weight as evidence, and these cases haven’t been proven in election interference investigations.
ButThe Bureau’s investigation of these new CSIS allegations, illuminates deeper concerns in the Chinese interference story that shocked Canadians over the past year, exposing gaps in Ottawa’s current foreign interference inquiry, which only mandates Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to examine the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.
This is shortsighted, according to political experts and the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment, which says “interference actors and activities can span various levels of government.”
“For this federal inquiry, it's like they are examining their front doors, but they don’t realize the whole back wall of the house is missing,” said former Vancouver mayor Kennedy Stewart.
Stewart — a political scientist and former NDP Parliamentarian — defeated Sim by 957 votes in Vancouver’s 2018 election, and lost to Sim by over 36,000 votes in 2022.
“I don’t know if this interference, which I am now almost certain occurred, was enough to tip the balance in 2022,” Stewart said. “But it looks like it almost worked in 2018 too, which is shocking.”
Ken Sim’s office has not responded to questions from The Bureau for this story.
In March 2023 Sim reacted furiously to The Globe’s controversial report, saying “insinuations” that his campaign benefited from Chinese Consulate interference wouldn’t occur “if I was a Caucasian.”
In a lengthy interview, commenting on cases from the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment, Kennedy Stewart added: “I can’t help but think, in any other G7 country, this would be a red-alert that your systems are being compromised, and there would be an immediate cross-party effort to get to the bottom of it.”
“But here,” he said, “in fact, there’s been cross-party collusion to limit this inquiry, to just the federal level.”
The Bureau asked Canada’s federal police in Ottawa if any of the three CSIS cases outlined in this story are being investigated for People’s Republic election interference.
“Currently, the RCMP is assessing information in relation to foreign actor interference, including electoral interference,” spokesperson Robin Percival said. “While we can’t speak further about this, we can confirm that if criminal or illegal activities occurring in Canada are found to be backed by a foreign state, it is within the RCMP’s mandate to investigate this activity.
“Sensitive Meeting”
The Intelligence Assessment says in June 2022, a “trusted contact” of a People’s Republic Consulate in Canada arranged “a ‘sensitive’ meeting with a provincially elected official.”
And this party leadership contender was to arrive at the Consulate in a separate vehicle and come in “via a side entrance,” the document says.
The meeting was to take place at a location inside the Consulate “where no outsider could observe the meeting taking place,” it adds.
The document doesn’t explain how CSIS learned of the June 2022 meeting arrangements.
But investigators captured an internal conversation evidently, because the CSIS record says “a PRC Consulate official noted that the arrangements were ‘slightly deceptive.’”
There is no explanation of what the provincially elected official and Consulate officials discussed, or what day they met.
But CSIS assessed, according to the document: “the PRC Consulate, after clandestinely meeting with CA3, signalled their preference for CA3 to the trusted contacts.”
And the candidate gained support after huddling with Chinese officials.
“Subsequently in July 2022, trusted contacts of the PRC Consulate organized a campaign rally for CA3 and the same trusted contacts have formalized their continued support for CA3 during the leadership nomination process.”
Charles Burton, a sinologist and former Canadian diplomat in China, said the case is unlike any to surface in previous reports of China’s election interference.
“I think the idea that a Canadian political candidate would make a clandestine visit to a Chinese diplomatic facility, is really shocking,” Burton said. “This is a whole different level of concern.”
Burton said diplomatic facilities typically have glass-walled, soundproof, secure-meeting rooms, where sensitive discussions can take place.
He said CSIS’s description of the Consulate meeting suggests Chinese officials could have met the candidate in a secure room.
“One would wonder if Candidate 3, being taken to the Consulate under surreptitious provisions, was taken into one of these rooms, to have a discussion that would not be monitored by CSIS,” Burton said.
“And one would be very concerned about what kind of undertakings the PRC might have made, to such a candidate.”
The CSIS Intelligence Assessment of this case, dated October 31, 2022, concluded that “trusted contacts … are now implementing the Consulate’s desires.”
Burton said, given what is knowable from the Intelligence Assessment and party leadership contests in Alberta and British Columbia, it is hard to discern who CA3 could be.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — who was not a provincially elected official during her party’s leadership race — defeated a number of elected MLAs on October 6, 2022, replacing Premier Jason Kenney.
In a final ballot vote, Smith beat the runner-up, Alberta’s finance minister Travis Toews, 46,400 votes to 36,400 votes.
The Bureau tried repeatedly and unsuccessfully to reach Toews to ask about his 2022 leadership campaign. Toews, a rancher and accountant, was first elected MLA in 2019 and retired before Alberta’s spring 2023 election.
“We are not aware of any leadership candidate participating in any such meeting,” United Conservative Party spokesman Dave Prisco emailed, in response to questions from The Bureau. “The UCP has stringent procedures.”
“Our verification and voting processes during the leadership contest were overseen by third-party auditors, scrutineers, and were streamed live on a publicly available webcam 24/7,” the UCP statement said “ensuring unparalleled transparency and accountability.”
The Alberta provincial government, like Ontario’s and New Brunswick’s, has a provincial intelligence office mandated to provide senior elected officials advice on foreign interference threats.
In British Columbia, no elected officials emerged to challenge attorney general David Eby in the race to replace Premier John Horgan, who stepped down in June 2022 for health reasons. Climate activist Anjali Appadurai — an outsider candidate — was disqualified by the B.C. NDP executive, purportedly for violating party membership rules. Eby was acclaimed party leader and effectively became B.C.’s premier on October 21, 2022.
A human rights lawyer who ran unsuccessfully for Vancouver City council in 2008, Eby was first elected for the B.C. NDP in Vancouver-Point Grey in 2013.
The Bureau asked Eby’s office and B.C. NDP to answer whether any elected provincial official running for party leadership was involved in a clandestine Consulate meeting and received support from Consulate contacts in July 2022.
“All of the allegations presented are completely false,” the premier’s spokesperson Jimmy Smith emailed in response.
“There is absolutely no truth to the assertion that Premier Eby had any meetings with or invited support from the Chinese Consulate, or any of their representatives, during his time as a candidate for the leadership of the BC NDP. The publishing of such an assertion is defamatory.”
Smith said the NDP government is working with Elections BC on potential reforms ahead of the October 2024 provincial election, and “these changes seek to increase transparency and prevent acts of foreign interference as well as clarify independence requirements for third-party sponsors.”
Eby’s spokesman did not answer whether B.C.’s government is looking into implementing a provincial security office such as Alberta’s and Ontario’s.
Incredibly Troubling
According to photos and a July 27, 2022, Chinese-language media report analyzed by The Bureau, leaders of the community group CCS100 were invited to attend Eby’s July 2022 campaign event in Vancouver and supported his party leadership bid.
The group lists Conservative Senator Victor Oh, who campaigned against a foreign agent registry in 2023, as an honorary advisor.
The July 2022 Rise Media article, written by TV broadcaster Ding Guo, endorsed Eby’s leadership candidacy.
The piece argued Eby deserved support from Chinese-Canadian voters, although as NDP housing critic, he’d been accused of being “anti-Chinese” for participating in a study that probed Mainland China investment in Vancouver real estate.
But Eby made amends by visiting editors at a Mandarin-language TV station in Vancouver and repeatedly apologized for “inappropriate remarks he made on the issue of Chinese real estate speculation in 2015,” the July 2022 article says.
The October 2022 Intelligence Assessment observes that generally, Beijing has completed a “takeover” of Chinese-language media in Canada and seeks to “manipulate and influence key media entities,” during election periods.
In an interview Brad West, mayor of the Vancouver-area municipality Port Coquitlam, said information in the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment resonates with his awareness of CSIS concerns in Canada.
“What you read to me is incredibly troubling and concerning that they're operating at that high of a level,” West said, of allegations that an elected provincial official met clandestinely with Consular officials, and that a Canadian mayoral candidate received funding from co-opted community leaders.
“Not only are they trying to support and elevate people who they believe they can have a relationship with into positions of greater influence,” West said, “but they also try to identify threats and neutralize them.”
West says after CSIS warned him in 2020 the Vancouver Chinese Consulate was enraged with his criticism of Beijing’s influence in B.C. politics, Chinese community sources informed him in 2022, that pro-Beijing community leaders had unsuccessfully attempted to recruit a mayoral candidate to defeat West in Port Coquitlam’s election. CSIS has not commented on West’s allegations.
“They want these politicians to think that, if they hope to have the support of the Chinese community and Chinese voters, then it must go through officials of the Chinese Communist Party,” West said. “That in of itself, is insulting and racist.”
The October 2022 Intelligence Assessment makes a similar point.
“Trusted interlocutors such as proxy agents or co-opted community organizations,” are used to “channel monetary donations and other assistance to preferred candidates in elections, with the intent of fostering a bond of obligation,” the document says.
But support from these “gatekeepers” is transitory.
“If the preferred candidate pursues a course of action contrary to that of the foreign state,” the document says, “community support would likely be withdrawn and the candidate could potentially lose their next election.”
“Elect the next leader of a federal political party”
A prominent theme of The Bureau’s analysis on China’s election interference has been that Beijing favoured Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party in the 2019 and 2021 contests, and Trudeau’s government has failed to counter foreign interference, perhaps because Trudeau is benefiting.
Among a number of CSIS documents reviewed by The Bureau, a December 20, 2021 report says the loss of two incumbent Conservative MPs in the 2021 federal election showed Mainland Chinese immigrants were “beginning to show their strength during elections.”
And People’s Republic diplomats planned to target Chinese-Canadians in upcoming federal elections with this message: “The Liberal Party of Canada is becoming the only party that the PRC can support.”
It’s believed that Vancouver-area Conservatives Kenny Chiu and Alice Wong are the two defeated MPs referred to, and CSIS gleaned this intelligence from Vancouver’s Chinese Consulate.
But other documents describe different angles to Beijing’s sophisticated interference in 2019 and 2021, including calibrated support for some federal Conservative politicians.
Under the subheading “Money” the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment seems to demonstrate such a case — indicating that in 2022 “a PRC-linked proxy” was attempting to “help elect the next leader of a federal political party in Canada.”
This unidentified Chinese agent “and their associates” were “actively signing up party members – and paying their membership fees – in order to support a particular leadership candidate,” the document says.
It adds the proxy was also “encouraging individuals who are supportive of the Chinese Communist Party in Canada to join this same political party in an effort to influence ‘the party towards having a more positive view of China.’”
The Intelligence Assessment continues to say the Chinese agent in question, “argues that this Canadian political party is being influenced by members of the Falun Gong … and as a result, is ‘anti-China.’”
In conclusion, it says: “The proxy perceives that if they can successfully get the leadership candidate elected, the proxy and their associates will “have some level of control” within the party, and might even be able to secure a powerful party position.”
Both the Conservative Party and Green Party held leadership contests after the 2021 federal election. The Green Party — which advocated for the release of Meng Wanzhou and has only two seats in Parliament — doesn’t appear to be the party described in the Intelligence Assessment.
But political insiders with knowledge of the Conservative’s 2022 leadership race said the case aligns with incidents they are aware of.
In October 2021, a Chinese community group made headlines, asking O’Toole to step down and claiming his criticism of Beijing had alienated Chinese-Canadian voters.
The same group subsequently supported a Conservative leadership candidate that was disqualified by the party in mid-2022, several months before Pierre Poilievre won the Conservative leadership race.
In an interview O’Toole, now a corporate consultant, said the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment “confirms what I had heard speculated about in the aftermath of the 2021 election.”
“It is very troubling, and shows why we need Justice Hogue to push the boundaries of her terms of reference,” O’Toole said, “so that we can properly understand risks to our democracy, and protect it.”
But party spokesperson Sarah Fischer stated “The Conservative Party of Canada is not aware of the allegations you mention.”
“Party memberships purchased during the last leadership race could only be purchased with a personal credit card, personal cheque or Canadian bank-issued money order,” Fischer said, in response to The Bureau’s questions.
Fischer added the party “implemented a number of measures to protect against the inappropriate purchase of party memberships.”
“Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has consistently been outspoken against Beijing’s interference in our democracy and will continue to be,” she said.
In an interview Charles Burton, the former Canadian diplomat, said it makes sense that Beijing would attempt to elect a new Conservative leader less hawkish than O’Toole.
He says during the leadership race in 2022, he discovered a WeChat post that called Poilievre an anti-Chinese racist, and warned Poilievre would make Kenny Chiu — the Richmond, B.C., MP attacked on WeChat and defeated in 2021 — foreign minister in a Conservative government.
“Certainly there is concern that a Conservative government might adopt positions similar to Erin O’Toole’s platform,” Burton said. “And China is rightly concerned that Conservatives will adopt a position on China that is aligned with the United States.”
Burton added Conservative leadership race allegations speak to the “well-funded, well-staffed, highly multi-variegated” influence operations of China’s Ministry of State Security and United Front Work Department networks in Canada.
“In addition to supporting candidates from preferred parties, they will also look to candidates in the opposition party,” Burton said, “to get more people into Parliament and Parliamentary committees.”
“Community Networks”
In interviews, Kennedy Stewart said in late May 2022, CSIS warned him China would likely interfere in Vancouver’s upcoming municipal election. And Chinese-media entities, partly owned by Beijing, were part of the threat.
This wasn’t a big surprise, Stewart said, adding he believes the City of Vancouver and Elections BC have few tools to discern provenance of funds in Vancouver elections.
“There is no doubt in my mind there has been foreign interference in Vancouver politics for many years,” Stewart said, “and there is little you can do about it at the local level.”
Vancouver politicos point to the city’s 2005 election, when speculation swirled around the campaign of right-leaning candidate Sam Sullivan.
One of Sullivan’s first moves as mayor was ordering Falun Gong to dismantle a protest hut erected outside the gates of China’s Consulate on Granville Street.
In a court case that followed, Sullivan — a fluent Mandarin speaker — acknowledged he had dined privately with Consular officials before moving a bylaw to restrict Falun Gong’s protest.
But Sullivan denied he was influenced. He went on to become an MLA for the B.C. Liberal Party, which forged deep ties with Beijing — including dealings with the People’s Liberation Army — under Premier Christy Clark.
Under the heading “Community Networks” the October 2022 Intelligence Assessment explains Beijing’s interference is woven throughout Canadian democracy in hidden social webs consisting of Consular officials, “leaders of local Chinese Canadian community groups,” political staffers and targeted “political candidates/officials themselves.”
This system “enables an adaptable, resilient approach to extending and enabling PRC covert influence,” the document says, adding “the role played by each component varies by location and campaign.”
It continues, saying “CSIS intelligence from November 2021 and late April/early May 2022,” found a People’s Republic Consulate was “clandestinely supporting a particular mayoral candidate” in an upcoming municipal election.
“The Consulate has mobilized the leadership of three co-opted Chinese Canadian community groups to provide material and financial support for this candidate,” the Intelligence Assessment says.
“It is noteworthy that the PRC Consulate supported this same mayoral candidate in the 2018 municipal election, and used the same community groups to clandestinely channel this support.”
Elections BC donation records indicate the leaders of a Chinese community group that is affiliated to the Vancouver Consulate and has been investigated in RCMP’s so-called Chinese police station probe, donated to Sim’s successful 2022 campaign.
Mayor Ken Sim’s office hasn’t yet responded toThe Bureau’s questions for this story.
Another intelligence record reviewed by The Bureau, a 2019 document from NSICOP — Parliament’s bipartisan intelligence review body — says “the PRC Consul General in Vancouver also boasted that she controlled over 100 community groups.”
“Now two elections in a row”
In an interview Stewart said what stands out, in hindsight, is that his pollster had forecast a large margin of winning votes that evaporated in the closing days of the 2018 election.
Again in the 2022 election, Stewart’s optimistic vote tally collapsed in the final week, he says. Meanwhile, voters that were invisible to Stewart’s pre-election polling seemed to materialize for Sim.
“Now two elections in a row, you have this kind of very strange behaviour that defies political science,” Stewart said. “But now, the fog is starting to lift. This [Intelligence Assessment] is a report from CSIS. So I have to believe it. And this is why an inquiry is so important, to reassure Canadians of their democratic process.”
While previous reports have noted Tong Xiaoling, the Consul-General who departed her post July 28, 2022, was displeased with Stewart’s friendly posture towards Taiwan, Stewart thinks Vancouver real estate is the real key to China’s election interference.
Stewart says he suspects most of Vancouver’s development is driven by investors from Mainland China, and Vancouver developers effectively control the majority of municipal campaign donations.
“About three weeks out from the election in 2022, my funding just stopped,” Stewart said.
“I’m looking out my window here, and seeing a Trillion-Dollars of real estate in Vancouver,” he added. “There’s a lot to play for here. And all of it is controlled by six votes on an 11-member council. You can turn a single family home into a 60-story-tower, overnight.”
Anyone paying attention should know this bu the population of Canada is willfully blind.
If CSIS can’t persuade the top politicians to pay attention, what then? Essentially there are no consequences. Bring Cash could become Canada’s motto. PP may already be defeated because his main slogan has been Carbon Tax Carney.