The Bureau

The Bureau

Huawei Policy Offered Cash for Competitors’ Information, Prompting Whistleblower Report to FBI

Justice Department exhibits obtained by The Bureau detail rewards tied to confidentiality, encrypted submissions and monthly payments.

Sam Cooper's avatar
Sam Cooper
Oct 14, 2026
∙ Paid
Huawei’s 2013 reward scale for competition information, from a Justice Department exhibit in the company’s Brooklyn criminal trial. Obtained by The Bureau.

BROOKLYN, New York — Huawei’s American management warned employees they could be fired for collecting competitors’ confidential information after mainland China headquarters circulated a policy offering cash rewards for competitive intelligence, including product roadmaps, pricing and organizational information, according to Justice Department exhibits obtained by The Bureau.

The July 2013 documents, marked as government exhibits 16335 and 16336 in Huawei’s Brooklyn criminal trial, capture both the scale and reward structure of what prosecutors allege was a program to obtain competitors’ secrets, and the American operation’s response.

The policy tied payments to the confidentiality and importance of information, established a review process and directed staff to encrypt higher-tier submissions. Submissions were to be reviewed weekly and rewards paid monthly.

The English text says: “No punishment: everyone is encouraged to provide valuable competition info; no punishment.”

Two days later, an email from Jennifer Ponder, signed by Huawei Device USA’s management team, warned American employees against participating in the collection of competitors’ confidential material.

Read together, the documents provide a detailed view of evidence central to the government’s allegation that Huawei’s pursuit of competitors’ secrets extended beyond isolated employees. The policy describes an organized departmental system involving regional managers, headquarters reviewers, designated submission channels and recurring rewards.

Whether Huawei’s information-gathering system amounted to an organized theft program is a question the jury will have to consider.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Sam Cooper.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Sam Cooper · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture